We are in the worst timeline
- Thread starter charlie
- Start date
"Instead of fighting each other, employers and workers should be united in battle against their common enemy: the capitalistic finance which overshadows the world, and its representative, the Jew." - Gottfied Feder
charlie
Real Bebopper
You must be 18 to be on this forum.
porcy
https://substack.com/@2010snetutopia
Who I joke, it all started with Telcom Act 1996 (and ends with Chat control #5...).
I wonder if people apply, or they will go to darker places or offline (where Feds will wait... OK, idk, If I'll be right about that, it means it is Over, as in DONE...)
After marketability and "owning it up to /2
mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
@mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
· 14s
Noncompliant, anti-statusquo, anti-cap "foreign operations/acteurs", - making speech punishable (been for while but depends on at-place legislation) -- what next?
Blaming t. People shouldn't react to bait etc, when "they need to be protected from themselves" - and totally NOT exploring taboos or /3
mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
@mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
· 14s
Pressuring matter at hand (eeeehm, UK; real HIT with "bad emo altright b*tch E(a)milia".) If planned or accidental "win"/noise by Labour-type-thinktanks, - it revealed both how message gets corrupted to "own up" opponent, w/ that too, mistep can look like masterplan, with too many cooks for place /4
mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
@mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
· 14s
Which way, Western men (XD)?
Being edgy for sake/own of it, -for sake to belong, -sake to tell "truth", "how it is", -sake of "not being wrong/nice" anymore...?
Empathy can be weaponized (this is not post about migration, nor "suicidal empathy"), but that doesn't mean you have to give up. /5
mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
@mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
Don't give time, attention and "munition" to those not worth of it. - people who say one thing and do another, populists, "class"-traitors ...
It is easier to say than to do. I lost "the game", I am overreacting already.
Whatd we do- how to act???
(Class consc-ness or wutevr, no time soon,huh.../6
9:04 AM · Feb 20, 2026
·
Translate
mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
@mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
· 14s
"Too soon" for that - they don't admit what they do and believe on TV, yet...
!
I wonder if people apply, or they will go to darker places or offline (where Feds will wait... OK, idk, If I'll be right about that, it means it is Over, as in DONE...)
After marketability and "owning it up to /2
mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
@mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
· 14s
Noncompliant, anti-statusquo, anti-cap "foreign operations/acteurs", - making speech punishable (been for while but depends on at-place legislation) -- what next?
Blaming t. People shouldn't react to bait etc, when "they need to be protected from themselves" - and totally NOT exploring taboos or /3
mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
@mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
· 14s
Pressuring matter at hand (eeeehm, UK; real HIT with "bad emo altright b*tch E(a)milia".) If planned or accidental "win"/noise by Labour-type-thinktanks, - it revealed both how message gets corrupted to "own up" opponent, w/ that too, mistep can look like masterplan, with too many cooks for place /4
mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
@mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
· 14s
Which way, Western men (XD)?
Being edgy for sake/own of it, -for sake to belong, -sake to tell "truth", "how it is", -sake of "not being wrong/nice" anymore...?
Empathy can be weaponized (this is not post about migration, nor "suicidal empathy"), but that doesn't mean you have to give up. /5
mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
@mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
Don't give time, attention and "munition" to those not worth of it. - people who say one thing and do another, populists, "class"-traitors ...
It is easier to say than to do. I lost "the game", I am overreacting already.
Whatd we do- how to act???
(Class consc-ness or wutevr, no time soon,huh.../6
9:04 AM · Feb 20, 2026
·
Translate
mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
@mac-minus-cafe.bsky.social
· 14s
"Too soon" for that - they don't admit what they do and believe on TV, yet...
!
porcy
https://substack.com/@2010snetutopia
I want to buy into socialism, I kinda did by on edge, but the gatekeeping makes things worse.
This is also critique of post-2014(?) EU- it became pro-economic and anti-people. Silent part told loud would be (by my POV), "people are stupid and need to be protected", but that too goes away, when eu (seems to) sleep on good time and went social-in, than economics and bureaucracy, us-dependancy it tries to solve now at-haste. People (from leftist circles) criticize eu for being economic (always was, but this era, even more - going into tech, military, surveillance and computers sectors - and some say, again its populace - kaja kallas talk about breaking Russia into parts don't help the suspicion...) - and little, now even, antisocial ("you are the problem, voters, that's why we can't have nice things", while populists still roam Brussels... wtf, eu decide, which one is it -always blaming (actual XD) taxpayers, aren't you!)
This is also critique of post-2014(?) EU- it became pro-economic and anti-people. Silent part told loud would be (by my POV), "people are stupid and need to be protected", but that too goes away, when eu (seems to) sleep on good time and went social-in, than economics and bureaucracy, us-dependancy it tries to solve now at-haste. People (from leftist circles) criticize eu for being economic (always was, but this era, even more - going into tech, military, surveillance and computers sectors - and some say, again its populace - kaja kallas talk about breaking Russia into parts don't help the suspicion...) - and little, now even, antisocial ("you are the problem, voters, that's why we can't have nice things", while populists still roam Brussels... wtf, eu decide, which one is it -always blaming (actual XD) taxpayers, aren't you!)
porcy
https://substack.com/@2010snetutopia
[People “jump to conclusions” because the environment rewards it
You mentioned phones, but you didn’t reduce everything to phones — and that’s exactly right. Phones amplify the problem, but they didn’t create it.
What you’re noticing is this:
People increasingly react to the feeling of a situation, not the reality of it.
And when people act on feelings alone, it becomes a self‑fulfilling prophecy:
“I think this person is bad → so I treat them like they’re bad → they react defensively → see, I was right.”
“I think the system is corrupt → so I disengage → the system becomes less democratic → see, I was right.”
“I think society is collapsing → so I panic → panic spreads → see, I was right.”
You’re not wrong. This is a real psychological loop.]
/
Yes. Making them anxious. Lip service, but everybody shittalks and do bare minimum to get by, just to make it to "next people who will be there when it breaks again, will fix it, anyway"...
[When leaders say:
“We care about you,”
but act like:
“We don’t trust you,”
…citizens stop trusting them back. / It’s not that people don’t care.
It’s that caring feels pointless when the system doesn’t reward it. ... participation → no influence (When you don’t trust yourself, you cling to the familiar — even if the familiar hurts.
That’s the loop.)]
You mentioned phones, but you didn’t reduce everything to phones — and that’s exactly right. Phones amplify the problem, but they didn’t create it.
What you’re noticing is this:
People increasingly react to the feeling of a situation, not the reality of it.
And when people act on feelings alone, it becomes a self‑fulfilling prophecy:
“I think this person is bad → so I treat them like they’re bad → they react defensively → see, I was right.”
“I think the system is corrupt → so I disengage → the system becomes less democratic → see, I was right.”
“I think society is collapsing → so I panic → panic spreads → see, I was right.”
You’re not wrong. This is a real psychological loop.]
/
Yes. Making them anxious. Lip service, but everybody shittalks and do bare minimum to get by, just to make it to "next people who will be there when it breaks again, will fix it, anyway"...
[When leaders say:
“We care about you,”
but act like:
“We don’t trust you,”
…citizens stop trusting them back. / It’s not that people don’t care.
It’s that caring feels pointless when the system doesn’t reward it. ... participation → no influence (When you don’t trust yourself, you cling to the familiar — even if the familiar hurts.
That’s the loop.)]
Last edited:
porcy
https://substack.com/@2010snetutopia
I fear myself sometimes - agreeing with Yarvin and Musk - what we are wrong and people need to grow spine? From principle of their ideologues- or, my other reasoning would be - to not be stepped over by exactly those types (these two, of "few") are - if we fear and deny our internal taboos, - it might (?) give way to being used by these (types) and others...
Last three, losing empathy, boundaries, and becoming like people I (currently) abhor - tho idk if I do because I "have to", or because even if I something fond myself thinking "people are weak,..." I just deny(?) My own "shadow", of being opposite- I feel like I want to "strong", because if more people think the same (they do), then, - again - that is self-imposed cycle of "proving" they are right, proving that people deserve "this" -- simply, that felt victim(?) To "that" idea(s)...(?)
Last three, losing empathy, boundaries, and becoming like people I (currently) abhor - tho idk if I do because I "have to", or because even if I something fond myself thinking "people are weak,..." I just deny(?) My own "shadow", of being opposite- I feel like I want to "strong", because if more people think the same (they do), then, - again - that is self-imposed cycle of "proving" they are right, proving that people deserve "this" -- simply, that felt victim(?) To "that" idea(s)...(?)
Alcanium29
Musician
Nah, we can still do worse. This is just the worse timeline.
I suppose humanity, or rather human-driven civilisations (I mean if you an alien from a glorious eternal interstellar empire -- wasssup), they must go in cycles. Human nature drives this pattern, and because human nature won't change no matter how many fancy gadgets we make for ourselves, it alwyas follows the same rhythm.
At first we struggle, to harden ourselves to persevere - to triumph against adversary. Then you begin to reap the rewards of your conquest, for it is your right, earn with sweat and blood. But then, you indulge, for it is your right, Is it not? But growth is never infinite, but wants is. As the pool of wealth becomes cluttered by the minds that want ever more, The struggle against the external changes into the internal, and that civilisation -- itself a construction of the people, collapses.
Most civilisations experienced this, some survived collapses through the shifting the heads of states, therefore absolving past resentments with them, and reuniting the people under a new master; others die -- some conquered, at the moment of their low; others simply fractured irreversibly.
I feel our present degradation stems from the fact that our "civilisation", at the greatest extend, is near-global; our economical interests are conjoined and contorted, our cultural boundaries eroded -- hell, I'm typing to you from my workplace in SEA to you, who are most likely on the other side of the globe -- and the heavier the mass, the more spectacular the impact. I think we are past the point of no return, and we are going down.
It would be wise to segregate ourselves, isolate our own systems from the ones falling the fastest, but I don't think we can. Everything we depend on has become too deeply dependent on the global system, and every twitch from a small nexus, vibrates and shakes every nerve on the network. When the whole things goes down, I really think it has to be violent, it has to be ugly.
And the saddest part, is that it will be absolutely necessary for that to happen.
I suppose humanity, or rather human-driven civilisations (I mean if you an alien from a glorious eternal interstellar empire -- wasssup), they must go in cycles. Human nature drives this pattern, and because human nature won't change no matter how many fancy gadgets we make for ourselves, it alwyas follows the same rhythm.
At first we struggle, to harden ourselves to persevere - to triumph against adversary. Then you begin to reap the rewards of your conquest, for it is your right, earn with sweat and blood. But then, you indulge, for it is your right, Is it not? But growth is never infinite, but wants is. As the pool of wealth becomes cluttered by the minds that want ever more, The struggle against the external changes into the internal, and that civilisation -- itself a construction of the people, collapses.
Most civilisations experienced this, some survived collapses through the shifting the heads of states, therefore absolving past resentments with them, and reuniting the people under a new master; others die -- some conquered, at the moment of their low; others simply fractured irreversibly.
I feel our present degradation stems from the fact that our "civilisation", at the greatest extend, is near-global; our economical interests are conjoined and contorted, our cultural boundaries eroded -- hell, I'm typing to you from my workplace in SEA to you, who are most likely on the other side of the globe -- and the heavier the mass, the more spectacular the impact. I think we are past the point of no return, and we are going down.
It would be wise to segregate ourselves, isolate our own systems from the ones falling the fastest, but I don't think we can. Everything we depend on has become too deeply dependent on the global system, and every twitch from a small nexus, vibrates and shakes every nerve on the network. When the whole things goes down, I really think it has to be violent, it has to be ugly.
And the saddest part, is that it will be absolutely necessary for that to happen.