Used to hang out with those Tumblr-using types ... a fairly open-minded person who would be kind to anyone and tend to not judge others no matter who they are. Turns out that these people...
- I wanted to create new thread, but then, I was bumped this thread in my Mail.
Why not to use this opportunity (to my "profit"), then, and say what was on my mind, be-it this might be the (at best) adjacent place for my at-topic -!
#/ I became part, member of people I hate(d) (as O-Kud "typed" one of their in-group-kind; Comic Book Guy Stereotype; expanded more below.) - 'Just -Politics' Tooters...
What of worse - critique - 'of it all'; yet,- I still - participate (despite my hate for doing so...)? - Why would I "flang myself", do it/this to myself (in the first place)!?
"Thesis" about unwilling ingroups
"WHY 'ALL I HATE IS [A.I.]', NOW"
I will start with that I have always had problem with how Internet and people "on"[1] it, turned out to be.
We, born near the start and on rise of Millennium, had, as kids and teens, -
- this ideal of "just society", and how "Internet gonna solve all our ailments",[4] we might've inherited from past generations and generalisations in TV and media. (/…But, instead, we got proselytising, purity tests, flying morality relativism, and conflating loud with right and might, a.o. …, [0])
From flying cars (long way to mainstream), to webpunks and else "solving" capitalism (secret: 'it works as intended' - and all those media "dreams" might've just be ploy to get everyone and dog on web (later smartphones - you don't "need" it, yet, it's "became" necessity… [0]) in the first place…), we got bamboozled by stories, fairytales for children; we've been for total fools (they got us where they wanted (…/with it - nuance - dead, on arrival… [0]) - ?; - now they cry wolf: when people tell on them, masks glow, and there isn't much "what can be done now"…)[2] . Ones may say that was plan, others and same tried to warn us of "our immaturity". And rest didn't caught up on until swing swung in front of their faces/shins...[4]
(/)
- Now, enter "groups" (1) and (2) I marked on as "bookmarks". What I meant under "on", phrased like that?
Well, of course - keeping it short - I am talking of (1) "Bla(o)cklist Culture". In broader sense, it is 'practice' of (mainly leftists) ignoring people and groups on basis of ones' bias about them.[4]
/ Example of this might be, on alone, calling things (/-out) in "cyphers",[3] terms without clear distinguishion of meaning - be it from side of "victim", or "abuser" (I, or "con", can be either of those, telling on who you ask/are to one who talks - I can be abuser for not …, and victim of …, and but still be hated at the same time, instead of pity or being told what's "up"…[3]). Oftentimes, as those terms themselves connotes, (they) bear "carriage, load" of long and to outsider, tire(bore)some use-history, that is its' coming from leftist and resistance culture and tradition.[4] -
- <Problems, too, arise, when, for one, (for example) [is] want from (these very particular types of; mainly) leftists, and (vulgar) "SJWs", the "Theory" (particularly Marx - Capital) is in question. What (personally) boggles (me), is how they "whine" when you ask them about "Marx", and they tell you to "Read it!", - when it was You (/them) who told me/us to "(do) not be ignorant!". -
- What is this (for) behaviour? [Can we get rid of it, or at least, get others to come down to ignore it - as them-Marxists do(,) when asked about what got them there and (/mocking) how to "Theory off the paper" (w/o. bloodshed and hierarchy trap, (as) seen in history of the Movement)]>!…
/ Talking of (2) being lied to, told in "lingo of today", - "bait used to be believable". Nowadays, with rise of AI, algorithms being hidden "no more" (being on-nose), "broligarchs/neofeuds" 'telling/calling it how it is' and with overstepping - i.e. masks falling off, - there is no hiding we've been used to, and (we were) held in denial and ignorance before, -- shortly:, - them needing us, not us them; and taxes going back to us, not hiding someone's back (ass)…
/ At (point 3), hiding behind, and behind hiding, lie(s) terms, meanings and phrases - dogwhistles, jargon, learned irony, memetic virology and "canned", [x]-community-only humor for on-which site/social(s), - on-which social group/circle/clique. (Ingroup elitism…(?))[4]
- My personal beef with this type of logic bickers with how I (assume) was raised (which I can't hide on terms it seeps thru and thru in on texts I wrote), meaning I simply can't "let 'normies' die because "they plain-deserve it" [-] for "reasons how society is nowadays 'cause of them". As if people who say things like these, aren't the first and foremost reason (?) people now started to behave this irrational way. (/I get it, and while I try to deny that - there is ring, reason for this, - there; I do --.
Too - without rules, nothing can (not) stand still, whistand time, pressure, norms. In itself, even "no rules" is ontologicaly, rule in itself, and so are so norms, or try of lack thereof. /Chomsky theorem iirc i forgot name of; (it) consisted, iirc, of these such claims…) -- /what I see as "throwing baby with the dirty bathwater", in that "blaming game" can't be stopped by "being (smug) reddit-right/wise" -. To sic-cite classics (saying that hence I forgot name of author, or that I ever knew it, in the first place; Einstein??),
"Problem can never be solved with the same type/level of mind that <fought; ??> it."
-- i.e., - "cursed cycle" - to me, it looks like people denying or flat-out stopping doing things because they might just get popular (trope: it is popular — now it sucks!), or when people "jump bandwagon(s)" as of, rather-times "for love (of mankind…)", is done to piss, "own up" someone/something off, cause chaos, attention (e.g. virtue-signaling, pro-profit anticap./pro-social campaign [in socialism theory - decolonization[3], a.o.], good deeds for wrong, grey, not honest reasons…). -
- What might've "feel dishonest" about this,[4] is that, as noted (at least on my side) above ("for love"), is - this happens because of outrage and even sometimes self-inflicted "humiliation ritual" (i.e.e.g. "ownage", backfired) - instead of things rather being done for solidarity, acts of kindness [virtues], for/of need (this can be understood as selfless, even if you think it isn't - we dont act or think in vacuum, so what matters is it don't hurt anyone doing so)…
/ For (4)… AAAAAAAAA - I got point in on my mind, but forgot it - I guess, something on about how Left, got problems with messaging? --- Classic tirade from "Big tent / umbrella" Club Subscriber, talking, a.o., about how
Club Starvo (forgot your name)/AOC/Walz is and isn't too radical, leftist, unitary for own good, and how Left need to get Social(ist) (and out from Donor class), but, at the same time, get closer to voter and civil preferences. (Sorry not sorry for Narrative falling, and people going Right, when Left "do these" things it isn't doing enough good to have more solid voter base Right do… - can "we" have cake, and eat it, too? No idea…) --- I guess, I was on-about, too, how Left (again) can't (/?) stop Right and Their Own from "winning" emberassment trophies, with how it defends its' spiral into purity tests, and back - but no nuance in sight [Point (0) - this critique is seen/read thru-out the whole text, - (for) to be proofread and added on, on-post. You (might've) get "it" when done with text XD.]
As you, and myself too, got used, familiar with "this user", it comes to no surprise(,) that despite shear loads of text and thought put in it, author, once again, forgot to re-read the title after themselves.
But I think, from context, that not being the case - more of, title being clickbaity -. Author (myself) tried to write article - thesis, about how (mainly) Left did mistake (was, or wasn't it Feds, dismantling movements? /Remember OWS, COINTELPRO…) listening to its weak(?), - jumping shark head-first - into identity politics, bla(o)cklists, blame and guilt -games, doing reddit…tumblr…4chan politics (in the first place; - this ? is why we cant have nice things - jumping hoops, sharks, on global affairs, but never ever on local matters - is this why ? world looks shit-? - one would thought, age of "Aquarius", technology, information, age of "y2k-reason", connectivity (1) - no- it never was there
👎or free - always but a fairytale [if no, but gone when web went "easy" in '93, thru '00s…], ruse for naïve children…!), -
/* (forgot paragraph this refers to - you might find it, - I had not this luck today (just woke up to that I made wrong assumption - they don't only need to filter their idea of "bad apples" (power of Normies when under Leader /bluntly), -) - (saying,) they are control freaks, too(!). ...
>
